Last modified: 2011-08-28 21:24:16 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T30060, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 28060 - Collection extension should not add chapters in reverse order
Collection extension should not add chapters in reverse order
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Collection (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Christoph Kepper
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-03-15 15:45 UTC by Helder
Modified: 2011-08-28 21:24 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Helder 2011-03-15 15:45:07 UTC
If you go to [[b:Special:Book]] and use the button to create some chapters in the order you want them in your book, e.g.:
* Glossary of Biology/A
* Glossary of Biology/B
* ...
* Glossary of Biology/Z

you will get the chapters in reverse order:
;Glossary of Biology/Z
;...
;Glossary of Biology/B
;Glossary of Biology/A

This is wrong and should be fixed, because currently the options are either:
* Use drag and drop feature (if you can use it at all) to do a lot of permutations;
* Clear your collection and recreate the chapters in the reverse order [do you know the alphabet from Z to A? ;-) ]
Comment 1 Volker Haas 2011-06-24 12:50:25 UTC
Currently a chapter is added to the front of the item. For the above use-case this is unfortunate. But changing the behaviour would break other use-cases. Therefore I vote for not changing this.
Comment 2 Helder 2011-06-24 13:18:20 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Currently a chapter is added to the front of the item. For the above use-case
> this is unfortunate. But changing the behaviour would break other use-cases.
> Therefore I vote for not changing this.

Could you provide some examples of use-cases which would break if the extension was improved for the cases described? I think the situation described in comment 0 includes the most common cases on Wikibooks projects, were the structure (order of chapters) of the books are already defined when we want to create a PDF/ODT/printed version of them?

Besides, the feature certaily doesn't works as expected at the moment, so I don't think this bug should be tagged as WORKSFORME.
Comment 3 Bugmeister Bot 2011-08-19 19:12:30 UTC
Unassigning default assignments. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical/54734
Comment 4 Christoph Kepper 2011-08-28 21:24:16 UTC
fixed in r95637

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links