Last modified: 2013-04-21 13:29:56 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T29487, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 27487 - CSSMin should insert linebreaks every few 1000 characters
CSSMin should insert linebreaks every few 1000 characters
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
ResourceLoader (Other open bugs)
1.17.x
All All
: Lowest normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2011-02-17 07:17 UTC by Derk-Jan Hartman
Modified: 2013-04-21 13:29 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Derk-Jan Hartman 2011-02-17 07:17:06 UTC 
Many older browser (Netscape 4, NetFront etc) hate these huge single line CSS statements we have.

Why do we have them? what is the point. Inserting some linebreaks after a few thousand chars seems much safer.
Comment 1 Niklas Laxström 2011-02-17 08:56:23 UTC 
What's the actual problem? Does it affect any browser we're having active support for?
Comment 2 Mark A. Hershberger 2011-02-17 19:21:20 UTC 
/me goes to find a version of netscape navigator to test on.
Comment 3 Mark A. Hershberger 2011-02-17 19:35:02 UTC 
http://browser.netscape.com/releases in case anyone else wants to try trip down memory lane.
Comment 4 Bugmeister Bot 2011-08-19 19:12:57 UTC 
Unassigning default assignments. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical/54734
Comment 5 Krinkle 2013-03-06 05:49:07 UTC 
Setting back to UNCONFIRMED. Someone needs to provide proof of there being a problem.
Comment 6 Derk-Jan Hartman 2013-04-21 13:29:56 UTC 
Let's just close it, since realistically it is wontfix. We don't support these older browsers much and though we got this report (or several actually if my memory serves me well) on VP/T about 2 years ago, I haven't heard people complaining about a crashing browser since that time.

I guess they finally gave up on their browsers (or wikipedia :D )
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links