Last modified: 2012-05-08 13:55:04 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T28795, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 26795 - Fulltext search of CodeReview commit summaries, diffs
Fulltext search of CodeReview commit summaries, diffs
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
CodeReview (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-01-18 18:58 UTC by Brion Vibber
Modified: 2012-05-08 13:55 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Brion Vibber 2011-01-18 18:58:01 UTC
Being able to search for particular keywords or phrases in commit summaries or diffs can greatly help in tracking down a change.

It may be feasible to stuff custom entries into the searchindex table (w/ MySQL search) or indirectly into the search engine (w/ Lucene), but this may require infrastructure for a clean search engine update interface.

Being able to restrict the search by branch or path, date, or committer would be suitably useful with this. Identifying classes/methods/functions altered even when their definition lines don't appear in the diff would be *very* helpful, but might be harder. (Break these out to separate bugs if not initially built with the other stuff.)
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2011-01-18 18:59:25 UTC
Krinkle's got a grep thingy on toolserver which can help until something's more tightly integrated:

http://toolserver.org/~krinkle/wikimedia-svn-search/view.php?id=73&hash=2b7dc3d581c46613e69c42cc003cbf3a#F2L2788
Comment 2 Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-01-19 12:04:35 UTC
Mark, are we going back to using priorities for something? We usually just tend to ignore them...
Comment 3 Mark A. Hershberger 2011-01-19 20:48:49 UTC
Reedy, feel free to ignore them.  I'm marking them for me, mostly.  If I want you guys to start paying attention, I'll let you know.
Comment 4 Bugmeister Bot 2011-08-19 19:12:27 UTC
Unassigning default assignments. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical/54734

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links