Last modified: 2010-05-15 15:29:26 UTC
If you include a template with headers in an article with it's own headers, the headers from the templates have the wrong IDs, like this: ==Header in article (id="1")== ==Header from template (id="1")== ==Header2 from template (id="2")== ==Header2 in article (id="2")== ...which leads to unexpected results when clicking on the edit link to a section (you may be sent to edit a completely different section). Is this possible to fix? If not, we should probably disallow headers in templates... I've marked this as major because, although it has a workaround, users may not realise what has happened, leading to inadvertent screw-ups...
(Sorry, marked wrong bug as resolved)
Note also that if there isn't a native header corresponding to the template's bogus ID; e. g. the article is like this-- ==Header in article (id="1")== ==Header from template (id="1")== ==Header2 from template (id="2")== --the user clicking the [edit] link for the header with id 2 will be presented with an empty edit box. Either the included page shouldn't generate [edit] links, or the [edit] links should point to the included page directly (in which case the user must be informed his edits could affect many pages).
Fixed in CVS HEAD and REL1_3. See Bug 60
This isn't fixed, but the behaviour is wrong in a different way. The edit links are now numbered 1, 2, 3, 4... as if they were all in the article. See [[User:Kate/sandbox2]].
*** Bug 543 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Now fixed in 1.3, 1.4 and live on WP.
CLOSED
