Last modified: 2010-05-15 15:38:14 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 2630 - [[Special:BrokenRedirects]] limit parameter doesn't work
[[Special:BrokenRedirects]] limit parameter doesn't work
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Special pages (Other open bugs)
1.5.x
All All
: Low normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?t...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-06-30 14:15 UTC by David Benbennick
Modified: 2010-05-15 15:38 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description David Benbennick 2005-06-30 14:15:17 UTC
The limit= parameter is broken on [[Special:BrokenRedirects]].  For 
example, at

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=Special:BrokenRedirects&limit=20&offset=0

only 2 entries are shown.

By the way, the default title for this page 
([[MediaWiki:Doubleredirects]]) should be "Broken redirects", 
not "Broken Redirects", to agree with all other special page titles.
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2005-06-30 19:07:44 UTC
The limit itself worked fine, but the list contents are cached and not all entries 
are still valid. The no-longer-valid ones weren't being shown at all, which confuses 
the list paging display.

They're now shown in strike-out, giving a nice visual indication of how "old", 
relatively speaking, the cached list is.
Comment 2 Zigger 2005-06-30 20:21:43 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
>...
> They're now shown in strike-out, giving a nice visual indication of how "old", 
> relatively speaking, the cached list is.

This might also be useful at bug 1922 and bug 2599.

Comment 3 David Benbennick 2005-06-30 20:24:27 UTC
The same issue applies exactly to [[Special:DoubleRedirects]].  
(There are none at EN at the moment, though there are at the 
Commons.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links