Last modified: 2012-04-16 09:16:16 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T28210, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 26210 - Post method for libraries
Post method for libraries
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedi...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-12-02 20:25 UTC by Fernando Cosso
Modified: 2012-04-16 09:16 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Fernando Cosso 2010-12-02 20:25:33 UTC
Several libraries can only accept POST requests, making impossible to add them to the list of Book Sources.

Examples are

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Book_sources#Columbus_Metropolitan_Library

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Book_sources#Link_to_State_University_of_Campinas_-_Brazil

among others

It would be great if there is a way to make a POST request, something like this:

[POST|http://acervus.bc.unicamp.br/index.asp?modo_busca=rapida&content=resultado&iIdioma=0 rapida_filtro=isbn_issn&rapida_campo=MAGICNUMBER&rapida_bib=0&submeteu=rapida
 Find this book]
Comment 1 Derk-Jan Hartman 2010-12-02 20:37:26 UTC
Considered mailing the libraries instead and telling them to fix their searchengines so that they are "usable" ?

I see no reason why we should 'hack' mediawiki for such highly specialized and underutilized features just for "2 libraries", it makes no sense.
Comment 2 Fernando Cosso 2010-12-02 20:48:27 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Considered mailing the libraries instead and telling them to fix their
> searchengines so that they are "usable" ?
> 
> I see no reason why we should 'hack' mediawiki for such highly specialized and
> underutilized features just for "2 libraries", it makes no sense.

Actually there are several libraries that uses POST instead of GET. I sent a couple of emails some time ago but unfortunately I didn't get a reply.
I thought it would be easier to change mediawiki because there is an active developer group. 

Best Regards
Comment 3 Chad H. 2011-01-25 06:16:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> I see no reason why we should 'hack' mediawiki for such highly specialized and
> underutilized features just for "2 libraries", it makes no sense.
>

I agree. And the default Special:BookSources in vanilla MediaWiki works just fine.

Just like we don't support POST for normal external links, I see no reason to change it for this one page.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links