Last modified: 2012-02-11 22:42:02 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T27807, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 25807 - Date properties sort incorrectly in a 'sortable' class table created via 'output=template'
Date properties sort incorrectly in a 'sortable' class table created via 'out...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 25768
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Semantic MediaWiki (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal minor (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Markus Krötzsch
http://nettab.referata.com/wiki/BioWiki
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2010-11-06 12:19 UTC by Dan Bolser
Modified: 2012-02-11 22:42 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Dan Bolser 2010-11-06 12:19:24 UTC 
I am using an ask query with the 'tabular output' recipe [1]. The resulting sortable table, which sorts dates correctly when you do a straight 'format=table' ask query, is sorting dates in alpha-numeric order.

The type of the field is being lost when passed to the template.

Any way to get the sortable table to sort dates correctly?


http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=AANLkTi%3DcfkV1pFVqN4%2B1Zd9Me2L-sMKDFPkeY5BZa3m2%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=semediawiki-user
Comment 1 Dan Bolser 2010-11-06 12:21:39 UTC 
Sorry, the URL for the recipe I referenced is here:

[1] http://smw.referata.com/wiki/Use_the_ask_template_format_to_create_tabular_output
Comment 3 Dan Bolser 2010-11-06 19:34:13 UTC 
*** Bug 25768 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Dan Bolser 2010-11-06 19:35:42 UTC 
Sorry, I should really have made this bug a duplicate of that one... not sure how to undo it now... I searched but didn't find the latter bug.
Comment 5 skew 2010-11-06 20:30:55 UTC 
No problem, as long as it gets fixed.  I linked them together to add more technical information.
Comment 6 Markus Krötzsch 2012-02-11 22:42:02 UTC 
Anyway, something needs to be a *closed* duplicate here. No use having two open bugs for the same issue. I am now declaring this bug to be the duplicate of bug 25768.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 25768 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links