Last modified: 2011-12-08 16:53:11 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 25651 - Requesting for the namespace "Portal" for Tagalog Wikipedia
Requesting for the namespace "Portal" for Tagalog Wikipedia
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-10-26 01:27 UTC by Shirou15
Modified: 2011-12-08 16:53 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Shirou15 2010-10-26 01:27:16 UTC
The Tagalog Wikipedia is requeting for the namespace "Portal".

1)When we are going to create a new "Portal", the namespace always see is the "Article". (E.g. http://tl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Anime_at_Manga)
Comment 1 p858snake 2010-10-26 01:28:29 UTC
Please show a link to community consensus for this change.
Comment 2 JeLuF 2010-10-26 05:38:09 UTC
Please also provide a name for the discussion namespace
Comment 3 Josh Lim 2010-12-03 14:03:42 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Please show a link to community consensus for this change.

(In reply to comment #2)
> Please also provide a name for the discussion namespace

Discussion has been taking place on the Tagalog Wikipedia, but consensus has not yet been achieved.  That's currently being done now at the local village pump: http://tl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usapang_Wikipedia:Kapihan#Portal_Namespace.

The namespaces would be localized as "Puntahan" and "Usapang puntahan" for the namespace and the discussion namespace.  However, this may be tentative: the translation is based on the current translation for the Community Portal, and there may be editors who might prefer "Portada" and "Usapang portada" as the translations.
Comment 4 Antoine "hashar" Musso (WMF) 2011-01-19 21:02:19 UTC
Josh, can you ask again the community  about the Portal namespace?
Once consensus has been reached, please reopen this bug.
Comment 5 Josh Lim 2011-01-20 10:11:52 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Josh, can you ask again the community  about the Portal namespace?
> Once consensus has been reached, please reopen this bug.

The question has been on our Village Pump for at least the last three months, and editors should be able to make judgement on it or not.  We don't archive regularly anyway, and when we do, it's usually due to size constraints, not length of time.  At either rate, I hope to get the namespace issue over with: we have four portals on the Tagalog Wikipedia which are being recognized as articles.
Comment 6 Diederik van Liere 2011-11-29 23:18:57 UTC
Dear Josh, can you please update on the status of this request?
Comment 7 Antoine "hashar" Musso (WMF) 2011-11-30 08:48:12 UTC
Looks like the namespace names should be:

 Portada
 Usapang Portada

There is already pages using those prefixes:
http://tl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natatangi%3ATalatuntunan+ng+unlapi&prefix=Portada&namespace=0&uselang=en

And some talks pages to (in NS_TALK):
http://tl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natatangi%3ATalatuntunan+ng+unlapi&prefix=Usapan%3APortada&namespace=0&uselang=en

So I guess we can deploy the change. Reopening bug.
Comment 8 Josh Lim 2011-12-02 14:14:24 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> Dear Josh, can you please update on the status of this request?

As far as I know, the discussion has stood silent owing to the fact that a lot of our editors have gone in and out of the project recently, and a lot of new editors are generally very apathetic about these types of discussions.  However, I am still very hopeful that this will be passed soon.
Comment 9 Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-12-08 16:53:11 UTC
Done, uncontroversial change and a small not so active wiki

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links