Last modified: 2011-03-13 18:06:40 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 25267 - Update message MediaWiki:Revreview-update
Update message MediaWiki:Revreview-update
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
FlaggedRevs (Other open bugs)
All All
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Aaron Schulz
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2010-09-23 17:11 UTC by Leinad
Modified: 2011-03-13 18:06 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description Leinad 2010-09-23 17:11:14 UTC
Please update message [[MediaWiki:Revreview-update]] - there is sentence about "undo", but now also exist button "Reject changes" ([[MediaWiki:Revreview-submit-reject]]).
Comment 1 Aaron Schulz 2010-09-23 21:43:44 UTC
What if 2 revs are pending and the second one needs to be reverted? One cannot "reject" it, but one can "undo" it.
Comment 2 Leinad 2010-09-23 22:06:55 UTC
So message should suggest use "undo" or "reject" depending on the situation.

Or look at local version... On we have modified text in this message (

"Zmiany nie zawierające wandalizmów lub innych defektów widocznych na pierwszy rzut oka należy zatwierdzić, w przeciwnym wypadku należy „anulować edycję” lub dokonać poprawek w trybie edycji."

In second part of this^ sentce we are suggesting undo all changes (if it is vandalism) or if only some part is incorrect, editor should improve in edit mode.
Comment 3 Aaron Schulz 2010-10-08 23:27:49 UTC
How (programmatically) would it depend on the situation?
Comment 4 Aaron Schulz 2010-11-18 19:02:09 UTC
That part of the message was removed in r76952. Such details may be part of popups in the future, but add too much clutter to always show.

Of course, any wiki can use custom messages.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.