Last modified: 2014-09-05 00:52:59 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T27055, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 25055 - Allow to transclude/show only threads (talk) TOC/titles
Allow to transclude/show only threads (talk) TOC/titles
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
LiquidThreads (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks: 25054
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-09-04 16:43 UTC by Nemo
Modified: 2014-09-05 00:52 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Nemo 2010-09-04 16:43:50 UTC
Some talk or requests pages are necessarily very big. Apart from the absurd [[WP:AN/I]], the usual solution is to subpage them. LQT, to be really useful, should allow to easily manage such pages. 
Beside bug 25054 and especially until bug 20542 has not been fixed, it would be useful to be able to show only the TOC of bigger talk/requests pages, to avoid loading of full text still allowing to quickly see all recent threads. 
An example of system that should be replaced by this one is it.wiki's village pump ([[it:Wikipedia:Bar]]), where every discussion has its subpage and the main page contains only an index of recent discussions, updated by bot ([[it:Template:Bar3/titoli/0]] and so on: several thousands of edits per year which could be avoided by LQT with an automatic, configurable index). 
This could be also a sort of workaround for bug 21690 and bug 25054 (if the index dimension could be set by date and not only number of threads).
If you was able to tranclude the TOC of other talks, this would also reduce the importance of bug 20542.
Comment 1 Andrew Garrett 2010-09-06 05:01:08 UTC
I believe that's what the patch on bug 20542 is for.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links