Last modified: 2014-09-23 23:58:03 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T25662, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 23662 - [ops] Monitor that LVS config and mw_install are in sync
[ops] Monitor that LVS config and mw_install are in sync
Status: NEW
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Deployment systems (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: ops
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-05-25 12:04 UTC by JeLuF
Modified: 2014-09-23 23:58 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description JeLuF 2010-05-25 12:04:50 UTC
In order to prevent out-of-date servers delivering corrupted pages, provide a monitoring script that checks whether the servers in the LVS config are also part of mw_install.
Comment 1 Domas Mituzas 2010-05-25 12:56:45 UTC
there's another related problem - out of date servers have outdated /tmp/mw-cache/conf* files - as they don't get rebuilt.

this happens when:

1. server goes down
2. new configuration is synced
3. server goes up
4. server builds cache based on old configuration
5. server gets synced new configuration
6. as new configuration timestamps are older than old cache, there's a desync

there would be multiple possible fixes, such as 'sync-common' cleaning /tmp/mw-cache/*, but detecting this somehow is important too...
Comment 2 Nemo 2013-04-09 21:45:46 UTC
Is this still current?
Comment 3 Andre Klapper 2013-04-23 17:44:52 UTC
JeLuF / Domas: Is this still an issue?
Comment 4 Andre Klapper 2013-05-16 18:44:15 UTC
Mark: Asking you as JeLuF and Domas are not around anymore: Is this still valid or is this obsolete nowadays?
Comment 5 Andre Klapper 2013-07-03 12:12:55 UTC
Mark: Asking you as JeLuF and Domas are not around anymore: Is this still valid
or is this obsolete nowadays?
Comment 6 Antoine "hashar" Musso (WMF) 2014-09-23 14:18:19 UTC
That is still valid. I heard very recently of an application server being pooled back with a wrong wmf version :-/   This bug probably needs to be filled in RT to attract ops attention.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links