Last modified: 2010-05-17 21:51:26 UTC
Hello. The Macedonian Wiki community has decided by voting to implement the FlaggedRevs or the patrolling. According to the vote and agreement, we have decided that admins, bureaucrats and autopatrollers should be able to patrol the articles on Wikipedia on Macedonian language. Here is the link to the voting, discussion and the voting results: http://mk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0:%D0%A1%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%88%D0%BC%D0%B0_(%D0%98%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%B8)#.D0.93.D0.BB.D0.B0.D1.81.D0.B0.D1.9A.D0.B5 So far we have just only voted and decided and users from other Wikipedias told me that you would be able to install this extension so the users can click on the patrolling button, see flags and all other components that go with this extension. Thanks a lot, Macedonian Boy, administrator on the Macedonian Wikipedia.
So, are there any news about this request? I did not hear anything so far. Thanks, MacedonianBoy
Done.
Thanks, there are red exclamation marks in recent change but I cannot patrol a page. What is the problem? Thanks again,
I have read the Bosnian request and the user that requested stated that they have enabled the user rights. So, we did not do such think (as far as I remember), do we need that and how it is done? As I informed you, I see red exclamation marks, but there is nothing to press on to mark a page as patrolled.
It seems that it functions very well. We patrol articles and made the users editor and patrollers, but we do not have any autopatrolers. That user right is not in the list of user rights promotions. That is my last question, where and how should be that user right added? Thanks in advance, MacedonianBoy
Autopatrol is a user right that has to be assigned in the mediawiki configuration. Please tell me which user groups should get the "autopatrol" property? - sysops? - patrollers? - editors? - a new usergroup?
OK, we have agreed that users that can patrol are: -sysops. -bureaucrats -patrolers, -autopatrolers. I have asked one bureaucrat all admins to be part of the editor and patroler groups and he did it ( I think the group patroler is available on mk wiki), but we do not have autopatrolers. So briefly, sysops, patrollers and editors should get that property. Regards
Hello again, I hope this is the last request. I think that we realized what we are missing on mk wiki. Can you add the following user groups to our wiki: -autoreviewer -patroller -autopatroller If you add these three to our wiki, the bureaucrats can add all admins to these groups and we will finish this process, I hope it will finish. Thanks in advance, MacedonianBoy
(In reply to comment #8) > Hello again, I hope this is the last request. > > I think that we realized what we are missing on mk wiki. Can you add the > following user groups to our wiki: > > -autoreviewer > -patroller > -autopatroller > > If you add these three to our wiki, the bureaucrats can add all admins to these > groups and we will finish this process, I hope it will finish. Thanks in > advance, > Who should be able to add/remove users from/to these groups? Just bureaucrats? Admins too?
Only bureaucrats. Admins change the user right editor.
Hello everyone. I would like to ask what happened with the user rights request? I think that will complete this request for good. Thanks and regards. MacedonianBoy
Done. =================================================================== Index: InitialiseSettings.php =================================================================== --- InitialiseSettings.php (revision 757) +++ InitialiseSettings.php (working copy) @@ -5172,6 +5172,11 @@ 'steward' => array( 'userrights-interwiki' => true ), // new steward stuff, yay 2007-12-27 'flood' => array( 'bot' => true ), ), + 'mkwiki' => array( + 'autopatrolled' => array( 'autopatrol' => true ), + 'patroller' => array( 'patrol' => true, 'autopatrol' => true, 'rollback' => true ), + 'autoreviewed' => array( 'autoreview' => true ), + ), 'nlwiki' => array( 'autoconfirmed' => array( 'patrol' => true ), 'checkuser' => array( 'deletedhistory' => true, 'deletedtext' => true, 'browsearchive' => true ), @@ -5544,6 +5549,9 @@ 'bureaucrat' => array( 'ipblock-exempt', 'bot', 'sysop', 'bureaucrat'), 'checkuser' => array( 'ipblock-exempt' ), ), + '+mkwiki' => array( + 'bureaucrat' => array( 'patroller', 'autopatrolled', 'autoreviewed' ), + ), '+nlwiki' => array( 'bureaucrat' => array( 'abusefilter', 'arbcom' ), ), @@ -5763,6 +5771,9 @@ 'bureaucrat' => array( 'bot', 'sysop', 'bureaucrat', 'ipblock-exempt', 'flood' ), 'checkuser' => array( 'ipblock-exempt' ), ), + '+mkwiki' => array( + 'bureaucrat' => array( 'patroller', 'autopatrolled', 'autoreviewed' ), + ), '+nlwiki' => array( 'bureaucrat' => array( 'abusefilter', 'arbcom' ), ),
If all these rights are available only a bureaucrat activates them, then it is ok. No common user should have them. Thanks a lot.
