Last modified: 2011-03-13 18:04:57 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T25152, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 23152 - Disable anon editing in main, Category, Template namespaces on ruwiktionary, bewiktionary
Disable anon editing in main, Category, Template namespaces on ruwiktionary, ...
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://ru:wiktionary
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-04-11 14:39 UTC by Al Silonov
Modified: 2011-03-13 18:04 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Al Silonov 2010-04-11 14:39:42 UTC
== Protection of 3 namespaces for the ru:wiktionary ==
Herewith we request to protect from unregistered users (UUs) three most important namespaces of the Russian Wiktionary (Викисловарь) - the Main namespace, Categories and Templates. We've discussed the issue in our community and agreed upon such a measure. Our considerations: 
# At this stage the Russian Wiktionary (as have many other language domains of the project) has evolved into a very complicated system with rather strict rules. Being a multi-lingual, multi-functional dictionary means that it has to strictly maintain uniformity of article structure - otherwise it cannot be reasonably considered dictionary, but merely a disorganized pile of information. Unlike what can be observed in Wikipedia, the representation of the content in Wictionary in not less important than the content itself. Even well-intentioned UUs generally fail to read, understand and/or comply with the rules of the Wiktionary and thus expose the articles to the risk of disfiguring.
# More than 95% of edits made by UUs end up requiring admin attention, whether it involves brushing up the added (usually in miniscule amounts) content, reverting or deleting the changes immediately. To date, according to the estimates, about 40% constitute outright vandalism, about 20% - spam, and the remainder, being well-intentioned, does not comply with the rules adopted for the project and thus deteriorate the articles rather than improve them; moreover, a significant part of it constitutes copyvio. 
# Over 90% of useful edits to the Wiktionary are made by Registered Users (RUs), including both creation of the new articles and enhancing the existing ones. 
# About 20% of the time many of the most active and productive RUs contribute to the project is dedicated to simply tracking down and undoing or improving the edits of the UUs, which we have started to consider an undue waste of time and effort, not to mention an added wiki engine overhead (dozens and sometimes hundreds of useless transactions every day). Thus, securing the main namespace from occasional unqualified newcomers will very likely accelerate the development of the project rather than slow it down. 
# The registration procedure is not at all complicated, while imposing some responsibility onto the users. Besides, all the talk/discussion pages and many other namespaces of the project will remain open to UUs, so restriction will not be excessive. Also, most of the active users of Wikimedia projects use the Single user login feature. 

The same goes for the Belorussian Wiktionary (be:wiktionary). There was no discussion there - since there actually is no community at present; so being pretty much the single user and the same time the single sysop of be:wikt I confirm the necessity of the same measure for be: as well.
Comment 1 Roan Kattouw 2010-04-11 14:49:26 UTC
Summary: disable anon editing of main, Category and Template namespaces on ruwiktionary and bewiktionary. Is this even allowed?
Comment 2 Casey Brown 2010-04-11 15:47:52 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Is this even allowed?

Not really. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Founding_principles  I think this issue has come up before and we've always said "we're not going to do that, sorry!"
Comment 3 Ariel T. Glenn 2010-04-11 16:01:46 UTC
I would suggest you look at the AbuseFilter and FlaggedRevs extensions as a means of managing anonymous edits.
Comment 4 Roan Kattouw 2010-04-11 20:41:00 UTC
Resolving WONTFIX per comment #2.
Comment 5 Casey Brown 2010-04-15 20:29:48 UTC
(Link to their rationale in English for the record, in case we revisit this bug in the future: http://meta.wikimedia.org/?oldid=1938803#Protection_of_3_namespaces_for_the_ru:wiktionary )

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links