Last modified: 2010-03-21 20:56:05 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T24882, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 22882 - Add a 'patroller' group to fr.wikisource
Add a 'patroller' group to fr.wikisource
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-03-18 14:54 UTC by Kipmaster
Modified: 2010-03-21 20:56 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Kipmaster 2010-03-18 14:54:40 UTC
Hi,

The current situation at fr.wikisource is that only sysops are able to patrol edits.

We would like to make the patrolling option also available to further users belonging to a 'patroller' group. Sysops should be able to assign a user to this group.

The vote is here
http://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Scriptorium/Mars_2010#Patrouilleurs

Small question: would the users belonging to that group be autopatrolled? Or do we need an extra white list for that?

Thanks,
Kip.
Comment 1 Roan Kattouw 2010-03-18 16:19:08 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Hi,
> 
> The current situation at fr.wikisource is that only sysops are able to patrol
> edits.
> 
> We would like to make the patrolling option also available to further users
> belonging to a 'patroller' group. Sysops should be able to assign a user to
> this group.
> 
> The vote is here
> http://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Scriptorium/Mars_2010#Patrouilleurs
> 
> Small question: would the users belonging to that group be autopatrolled? Or do
> we need an extra white list for that?
> 
That's up to you, both options are possible. On by far most wikis, patrollers are always autopatrolled.
Comment 2 Kipmaster 2010-03-18 19:00:57 UTC
Ok, Thanks! I cannot take the decision alone, I have to ask the community.

I'll tell the result in a few days (hopefully).
Comment 3 Kipmaster 2010-03-21 09:37:47 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> That's up to you, both options are possible. On by far most wikis, patrollers
> are always autopatrolled.

It seems that a majority is in favor of patrollers being always autopatrolled.

Thanks in advance.
Comment 4 JeLuF 2010-03-21 20:56:05 UTC
Done

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links