Last modified: 2012-10-19 17:06:43 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T24769, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 22769 - MediaWiki:Enotif body: Replace named Parameter
MediaWiki:Enotif body: Replace named Parameter
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Email (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: i18n
Depends on:
Blocks: 18521 29170
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2010-03-08 18:42 UTC by Umherirrender
Modified: 2012-10-19 17:06 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Umherirrender 2010-03-08 18:42:48 UTC 
The system message Enotif body is the only message (I found) with named parameter.

This breaks the use of {{int:}}, because the parser function can only handle numeric parameter.

Please replace the named Parameter from Enotif body by numeric parameter, or let {{int:}} work with that. Thanks.
Comment 1 Siebrand Mazeland 2011-09-12 13:07:54 UTC 
Robin, is this something you are interested in getting resolved? Niklas comments: Tried to fix this, but there is annoying lego thingie going here. Keeping BC is not needed. Needs concentration and carefulness.
Comment 2 Robin Pepermans (SPQRobin) 2011-09-12 21:11:48 UTC 
Sure, I can try to fix this, but I was wondering what the use case is of {{int:enotif_body}}.. It seems rather email-specific. Maybe for user talk pages?
Comment 3 Robin Pepermans (SPQRobin) 2011-09-12 21:16:35 UTC 
There's also 'enotif_subject' with named parameters, in the same function.

Also, are named parameters not something we want? I think they're better than numbers, so maybe we could adapt the parser to allow named parameters?
Comment 4 Sam Reed (reedy) 2012-01-03 17:17:32 UTC 
See r99942
Comment 5 Amir E. Aharoni 2012-10-19 17:06:43 UTC 
Is this fixed?
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links