Last modified: 2014-02-25 11:36:43 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T24711, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 22711 - Special:Contributions should have customized display for LQT edits
Special:Contributions should have customized display for LQT edits
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
LiquidThreads (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2010-03-03 05:20 UTC by Mike.lifeguard
Modified: 2014-02-25 11:36 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Mike.lifeguard 2010-03-03 05:20:18 UTC 
Per discussion on IRC:

Showing edits to [[Thread:Feedback/Stopping bad signatures?/Mike.lifeguard (4)]] when the user "really" (from their point of view) edited [[Talk:Feedback]] is quite confusing. Lines in contribution lists and the like should be forged to look like section edits on the page where discussion was taking place:

# (show/hide) 03:27, 5 November 2009 (hist | diff) N Thread:Feedback/Stopping bad signatures?/Mike.lifeguard (4) ‎ (Reply to Stopping bad signatures and other untraceable vandalism) (top) [rollback]

becomes something like

# (show/hide) 20:53, 2 March 2010 (hist | diff) m Talk:Feedback  (→Stopping bad signatures? Reply to Stopping bad signatures and other untraceable vandalism) (top) [rollback]

This is possibly a better approach than what's been done for RecentChanges, but is essentially the same idea. All forged lines should look the same though - one format for RC and another for contribution lists wouldn't be good. In an ideal world, even LQT history pages would use the same format as well, rather than the (eww!) table. This would provide a continuity of experience that's currently lacking, in addition to hiding ugly implementation details which are currently confusing.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links