Last modified: 2011-01-25 01:28:38 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T24319, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 22319 - $wgBlockDisablesLogin = true; for otrs_wikiwiki and chapcomwiki
$wgBlockDisablesLogin = true; for otrs_wikiwiki and chapcomwiki
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Rob Halsell
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extensi...
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-01-29 16:11 UTC by Raimond Spekking
Modified: 2011-01-25 01:28 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Raimond Spekking 2010-01-29 16:11:20 UTC
Per (short) discussion on otrs-admin-l I ask to install/enable the Lockout extension on the OTRS wiki.

If done before the next big scap deployment of r61664 is needed.

BTW: This extension could be useful for all private WMF wikis.
Comment 1 Guillaume Paumier 2010-01-29 16:29:24 UTC
If we do that, we should do it on all private WMF wikis listed in bug 13177 (and subsequently mark bug 13177 as wontfix)
Comment 2 Chad H. 2010-01-29 16:33:58 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> If we do that, we should do it on all private WMF wikis listed in bug 13177
> (and subsequently mark bug 13177 as wontfix)

I think the two are independent of another. Bug 13177 requires me to get password resetting for other users working properly again. I've got an outdated patch for it, but it still needs some work.

I'm inclined to say WONTFIX on this bug per http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/56415#c4568. It would be fairly trivial to integrate this extension into core, and I'm going to have a hack at it today.
Comment 3 Cary Bass 2010-02-17 23:48:39 UTC
Poke?  Hey Chad, what's the status of all this.  I've gotten an online request from nl arbcom that they'd really like to prevent inactive users from seeing wiki pages.
Comment 4 Effeietsanders 2010-03-09 23:31:11 UTC
Please add chapcom.wikimedia.org to this as well - would be good to finally be able to clean up a bit :)
Comment 5 Chad H. 2010-03-10 00:40:23 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Poke?  Hey Chad, what's the status of all this.  I've gotten an online request
> from nl arbcom that they'd really like to prevent inactive users from seeing
> wiki pages.

The functionality exists and has been reviewed. I assume it will be deployed at the next general code update to the Wikimedia sites (within the next week, from what I understand from Tim). At that point, wikis wishing to enable this (likely only private wikis like the ones listed here) can get a shell user to change $wgBlockDisablesLogin to true, like any other site configuration change.
Comment 6 Raimond Spekking 2010-04-13 11:06:52 UTC
The change is now live, so it only needs to get $wgBlockDisablesLogin = true;

Should be worth to set this for all private wikis.
Comment 7 Cary Bass 2010-04-13 18:32:58 UTC
Current settings for 

'wgBlockDisablesLogin' => array(
    'arbcom_nlwiki' => 'true', // # 22630
),

Make it:

'wgBlockDisablesLogin' => array(
    'arbcom_nlwiki' => 'true', // # 22630
    'chapcomwiki' => 'true', // # 22319
    'otrs_wikiwiki' => 'true', // # 22319
),
Comment 8 p858snake 2010-04-14 10:07:17 UTC
Instead of blocking, couldn't you also create a usergroup for example, such as CurrentMembers and then only give that the view rights and let the admins move people in and out out of it.

This method would still be logged ([[Special:Log/rights]]) the same way as the block method would be ([[Special:Log/block]]), But this method would give a "You are not authorized" message (unless changed) compared to a "You are blocked method"

Overall there wouldn't be that much difference between the two.
Comment 9 JeLuF 2010-04-16 17:37:28 UTC
Done.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links