Last modified: 2011-03-13 18:06:45 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T24292, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 22292 - Upgrade spyc
Upgrade spyc
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
API (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Sam Reed (reedy)
http://code.google.com/p/spyc/
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-01-27 23:01 UTC by Sam Reed (reedy)
Modified: 2011-03-13 18:06 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Sam Reed (reedy) 2010-01-27 23:01:09 UTC
Currently on 0.2.3

Release is 0.4.5

Not a huge amount of revisions (most are mainly docs or similar)...

So as long as the bugs/FR's are brought back in (Should we really commit these upstream too?)



Bjoern, i've added you as a CC, as thought you may be interested (as you seemingly use it)
Comment 1 Roan Kattouw 2010-01-28 02:06:00 UTC
I'm not sure we want to upgrade Spyc because it's such crappy code (see http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/42547 and http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/53613#c3860 for details). I've put some work into trying to get to behave reasonably, and I won't throw that all out without testing that an upgrade won't cause regressions.
Comment 2 Sam Reed (reedy) 2010-01-28 07:10:59 UTC
Ahhh

Wouldn't have even guessed about r53613, and r42457 explains why there is such a difference in code

I'll wontfix this then

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links