Last modified: 2014-11-18 18:07:19 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T24251, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 22251 - Magic word to remove page from (quick)search results
Magic word to remove page from (quick)search results
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Search (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement with 6 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
: 24169 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-01-24 11:48 UTC by Tisza Gergő
Modified: 2014-11-18 18:07 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Tisza Gergő 2010-01-24 11:48:08 UTC
One of the perennial debates (on the Hungarian Wikipedia, at least) is whether to delete redirects from old names in the project namespace. On one hand, even when links are updated, it destroys some navigation pathways (bookmarks, external links etc.), makes old revisions of pages (where the links are not updated) less readable and annoys some people; on the other, the old (and often erroneous or misleading) names clutter up the search suggestions dropdown, which is by far the most user-friendly navigation method currently). There is a similar problem with redirects from misspelled names of articles.

It would be very useful to have a __NOSEARCH__ magic word which would suppress indexing of such pages by the internal search engine (or maybe just adding a flag so that the page is only returned when such pages are explicitly requested).
Comment 1 Rd232 2012-03-17 10:48:30 UTC
*** Bug 24169 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Bachsau 2012-04-14 12:51:37 UTC
I wouldn't want a new magic word. May a config option, if __NOINDEX__ should also apply to internal search would do.
Comment 3 Rd232 2012-04-14 16:46:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> I wouldn't want a new magic word. May a config option, if __NOINDEX__ should
> also apply to internal search would do.

I doubt that if MediaWiki had that option, Wikimedia projects would use it: NOINDEX hiding content from internal search is usually not the desired behaviour for existing uses of NOINDEX. Equally, it's not certain that NOSEARCH uses should be hidden from search engines. Just provide both, for flexibility.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links