Last modified: 2011-01-25 01:06:28 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T24008, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 22008 - Abusefilter-log-detail for Arabic Wikipedia
Abusefilter-log-detail for Arabic Wikipedia
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-01-04 09:34 UTC by Salem
Modified: 2011-01-25 01:06 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Salem 2010-01-04 09:34:54 UTC
In the Arabic Wikipedia we canno view the detailed abuse log entries. I asked User:Meno25, a steward who participate in the Ar WP, he told that he doesn't know and that I should contact the developers.
Comment 1 Sam Reed (reedy) 2010-01-04 09:41:12 UTC
I presume this works on other wiki's?
Comment 2 Salem 2010-01-04 10:10:13 UTC
To be clear about what I meant, when I view the log in EN WP http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog I can, as an auto-confirmed user, view the details of every hit, Where in AR WP http://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog I cannot see the details. This is important to check if rhere are false positives because the filters in the Arabic version is very strict.
Comment 3 JeLuF 2010-04-09 17:42:31 UTC
The permission to view the detailed log is by default assigned to sysops only, not to autoconfirmed users.

Please provide a link to community consensus allowing also autoconfirmed users to view these logs.
Comment 4 Gurch 2010-04-09 21:50:46 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> The permission to view the detailed log is by default assigned to sysops only,
> not to autoconfirmed users.

Why is this? No harm seems to have come from allowing anyone to view it on en.wikipedia.
Comment 5 JeLuF 2010-05-17 19:57:56 UTC
Any news? What did the community decide?
Comment 6 Salem 2010-05-17 20:29:32 UTC
The discussion is here http://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%88%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%A7:%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86/%D8%A3%D8%B1%D8%B4%D9%8A%D9%81/%D8%AA%D9%82%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A9/04/2010#.D8.AA.D9.81.D8.B9.D9.8A.D9.84_.D8.AE.D8.A7.D8.B5.D9.8A.D8.A9_.D8.A7.D9.84.D8.AA.D9.81.D8.A7.D8.B5.D9.8A.D9.84_.D9.81.D9.8A_.D9.85.D8.B1.D8.B4.D8.AD_.D8.A7.D9.84.D8.A7.D8.B3.D8.A7.D8.A1.D8.A9_.D9.84.D9.84.D9.85.D8.B3.D8.AA.D8.AE.D8.AF.D9.85.D9.8A.D9.86_.D8.A7.D9.84.D9.85.D8.A4.D9.83.D8.AF.D9.8A.D9.86 (the equal of village pump tech). The discussion was advertised also in the abusefilter discussion page. Three people participated in the discussion: 1) the proposer, 2) user with abuse filter editing right who supported the proposal and said that even he cannot see the details and asked if admins can see the details, 3)the third participant is an admin who answered the question without commenting on the proposal. the discussion is more than 30 days old.
Comment 7 JeLuF 2010-05-17 20:41:00 UTC
Done.


} elseif ( $wgDBname == 'arwiki' ) {                                                                                     $wgGroupPermissions['sysop']['abusefilter-modify'] = false;
    $wgGroupPermissions['abusefilter']['abusefilter-modify'] = true;
    $wgGroupPermissions['*']['abusefilter-log-detail'] = true;
}

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links