Last modified: 2009-11-26 13:50:40 UTC
The Wikipedia Search search feature next 500 doesn't work even at "Results 1 - 50 of 4,870 for oid." Restarting firefox at safe mode nor restarting solve the problem. Window XP SP3 Firefox 3.5.5 (note this isn't cause by addons, i test it before). component (guess): wikibugs IRC bots
Related to bug #16236? --- Changed Summary Changed Severity (Workaround is to ask for less at a time) Changed Component (IRC Bot to lucene-2) Added URL
Created attachment 6823 [details] Layout Error (header + template) I think this is a definite MediaWiki bug. IE 8.0.6001.18702 and Opera 10.10.1893.0 had the same problem too. Previously I forgot to mention that the article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_sciences). The header dividers meaning (== title ==) displayed incorrectly. Since all browser had the same problem I didn't upload one for the other browser. Note: These layout problem happens "everytime" but only in certain article. Clearing prefetch in C:\WINDOWS\Prefetch, restarting and clearing cache through browser options doesn't solve the problem. irrelevant comment. I wonder are these problem caused by consistent Mozilla Labs add-on to improve ECMAScript and XML ajax handling.
(In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=6823) [details] > Layout Error (header + template) > > I think this is a definite MediaWiki bug. IE 8.0.6001.18702 and Opera > 10.10.1893.0 had the same problem too. Previously I forgot to mention that the > article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_sciences). The header dividers > meaning (== title ==) displayed incorrectly. You should open separate bugs for things that have nothing to do with this one. The problem you describe is not a bug in the MediaWiki software, it's a problem with the navbox template not closing a <table> tag.
(In reply to comment #3) > it's a problem > with the navbox template not closing a <table> tag. > Oh wait, that's not true. The problem is someone's abusing the ; Term : Definition syntax. I fixed this in the article.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 21287 ***