Last modified: 2013-06-18 16:24:56 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T23450, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 21450 - Machine readable content
Machine readable content
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 36881
Product: Wiktionary tools
Classification: Unclassified
General (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-11-09 15:38 UTC by Amgine
Modified: 2013-06-18 16:24 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Amgine 2009-11-09 15:38:19 UTC
We need a machine-readable section, probably not visible for human readers, containing content for all terms.

This pre-supposes agreeing on a data standard to support. There is a standard being used by many dictionary softwares, perhaps we should consider that as, at least, a base.
Comment 1 Andrew Dunbar 2009-11-10 00:46:58 UTC
Another problem would be keeping the machine-readable section in sync with the human readable section.

Another approach to keep them in synch would be to use something like a microformat where templates wrap parts of human readable text and add the machine readable info. This would of course make editing harder though, especially for beginners.
Comment 2 Amgine 2009-12-01 22:57:42 UTC
Alternative option: add machine readable elements to AutoFormat bot, or create similar bot to maintain machine-readable sections. (This could still be working in templates, or a combination of templates as bot marker.)
Comment 3 Andre Klapper 2013-06-13 17:26:41 UTC
This looks like it is superseded by bug 36881 in nowadays' times.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 36881 ***
Comment 4 MZMcBride 2013-06-14 00:11:07 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> This looks like it is superseded by bug 36881 in nowadays' times.

Bug 36881 is about Wiktionary. I didn't really get the sense that this bug (bug 21450) was about Wiktionary.

However, I think this bug is too vague to be useful, so I won't re-open it in its current form. It could be re-opened and expanded.
Comment 5 Amgine 2013-06-16 16:01:03 UTC
<nods> This was about machine-readable content, not exclusive to wiktionary, which is not at all what 36881 is about. But it is too vague and was a fly-by enhancement bug.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links