Last modified: 2014-06-19 17:46:42 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T23245, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 21245 - hidden category changes shouldn't cause html invalidations
hidden category changes shouldn't cause html invalidations
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Categories (Other open bugs)
1.16.x
All All
: Low major (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: performance
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-10-23 04:54 UTC by Domas Mituzas
Modified: 2014-06-19 17:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Domas Mituzas 2009-10-23 04:54:47 UTC
currently hidden categories are used as major tagging vehicle, some of them including over a million of pages - and changes on them cause extreme high rate of invalidations (enough to saturate squid cpu capacity).

we should have category invalidations code to somehow know that category is hidden before invalidating squid pages, or not do any invalidation on category changes at all, or have delayed check if such invalidation has to be done (so that flapping would not be possible).
Comment 1 Andre Klapper 2014-06-19 13:18:21 UTC
> currently hidden categories are used as major tagging vehicle, some of them 
> including over a million of pages - and changes on them cause extreme high 
> rate of invalidations (enough to saturate squid cpu capacity).

In the meantime Squid got superseded by Varnish. Wondering if "enough to saturate squid cpu capacity" is still valid concern nowadays.

Ori / Aaron: Does any of you know if this still exposes a problem, or if this can be considered obsolete due to software improvements in the meantime?
Comment 2 Aaron Schulz 2014-06-19 17:46:42 UTC
The job queue rate-limits the invalidations, so it probably won't hurt CPU much. It still will be wasteful so this is still a bug of sorts.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links