Last modified: 2009-10-01 19:27:48 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T22861, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 20861 - Flagged revisions, review log: minor but very helpful enhancement
Flagged revisions, review log: minor but very helpful enhancement
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
FlaggedRevs (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Aaron Schulz
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-09-29 05:15 UTC by FT2
Modified: 2009-10-01 19:27 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description FT2 2009-09-29 05:15:17 UTC
Can the review log include a link and basic timestamp/editor information, on reviewed revisions.

CURRENT:
   TIMESTAMP User (t|c|b) reviewed r11163 of [[Article]] ‎ (Comment: New_Status])

PROPOSED v1:

   TIMESTAMP User (t|c|b) reviewed [[Article]]‎ as at [Revision_Link Revision_DateTime], 
   by [[User:Editor|Editor]] (Quality level='''New_Status''': Reason)

PROPOSED v2:

   TIMESTAMP User (t|c|b) reviewed [[Article]]‎‎, and flagged the revision dated 
   [Revision_Link Revision_DateTime (RevisionID)] by [[User:Editor|Editor]] (Quality 
   level='''New_Status''': Reason)

and a filter on the review log to allow selection of all/sighted/quality

Rationale: if this were done then duplicated links in the enwiki test wiki could be removed cleaning up the interface considerably (the logs and the list of reviewed revisions would no longer both be needed in some places). It also makes sense on its own merit, since it's basically just asking that review log entries be linked to the revisions they reference.

This is a pure interface issue (the text written to the log); if it could be done quickly if agreeable, then it could immediately help the current test wiki by allowing the interface to be simplified. Hence this request (which is hopefully very easy).
Comment 1 FT2 2009-09-29 12:56:30 UTC
(note, the CURRENT text isn't linked - that's bugzilla's doing)
Comment 2 Aaron Schulz 2009-09-29 17:15:22 UTC
The was a link that somehow got broken, that was just fixed.
Comment 3 FT2 2009-09-29 17:44:14 UTC
Is there a chance of the extra data (=revision date+time, and name of user who created that revision) being shown in the log, to allow much easier review? Should be easy (I hope)

And the last part in (...) being simplified down to:
  (Quality level='''New_Status''': Reason)
Comment 4 Aaron Schulz 2009-10-01 19:27:48 UTC
Timestamp added r57242. Leaving out Username.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links