Last modified: 2009-08-17 13:20:16 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T22287, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 20287 - Wikipedia querks
Wikipedia querks
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
User preferences (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All Windows XP
: High enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-08-17 12:51 UTC by tyw7
Modified: 2009-08-17 13:20 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description tyw7 2009-08-17 12:51:35 UTC
Certain user gadgets (like Qui, the purge clock, and the * purge link) only work when I enable the following options:
* The JavaScript Standard Library, a compatibility library for browsers that lack full support for JavaScript 1.6. This includes Internet Explorer, Opera, and Safari 2.
*  Compatibility function to run scripts only tested on Monobook on the new Vector skin. Required for using Twinkle or Friendly (along with many other scripts) with the Vector skin.
Comment 1 Andrew Garrett 2009-08-17 12:54:59 UTC
The problem is with the gadgets, not with the skin.
Comment 2 tyw7 2009-08-17 12:56:30 UTC
Hoewever in the non beta version these gadgets worked perfectly
Comment 3 Andrew Garrett 2009-08-17 12:58:43 UTC
Yes, but the problem is that the gadgets are poorly-written and depend on particular aspects of Monobook's (the original skin) operation. The authors have failed to write them to be adequately compatible with future skins. You should talk to the original authors.

As you stated in your own bug report, there is a workaround available.
Comment 4 tyw7 2009-08-17 13:02:28 UTC
So can you report this problem to the gadget authors?
Comment 5 Andrew Garrett 2009-08-17 13:03:37 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> So can you report this problem to the gadget authors?

No, if you have a problem with it, you can report it to them yourself. As volunteers, it's not our job to do your work for you.
Comment 6 tyw7 2009-08-17 13:06:48 UTC
Who's the author of those gadgets?
Comment 7 Mike.lifeguard 2009-08-17 13:18:55 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> Who's the author of those gadgets?
> 

Please use [[WP:VPT]] for further inquiries in this matter.
Comment 8 Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2009-08-17 13:20:16 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Yes, but the problem is that the gadgets are poorly-written and depend on
> particular aspects of Monobook's (the original skin) operation.

No, the skin system is poorly written because it gratuitously changes around all the id's and classes at random from skin to skin for no reason, and every new skin these days adds its own totally different HTML output such that all scripts that interact with the page content are guaranteed to break.  I doubt that the usability people are going to be willing to rewrite Vector to use identical HTML output to Monobook at this point, but if there are specific id's that are missing for no reason, say, then we absolutely should add those for compatibility.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links