Last modified: 2011-03-13 18:04:36 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T21781, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 19781 - Submit count of templates and files needing rewiew.
Submit count of templates and files needing rewiew.
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
FlaggedRevs (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Aaron Schulz
: i18n
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-07-17 09:01 UTC by Purodha Blissenbach
Modified: 2011-03-13 18:04 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Purodha Blissenbach 2009-07-17 09:01:27 UTC
In each of the messages:

MediaWiki:revreview-basic-i
MediaWiki:revreview-newest-basic-i
MediaWiki:revreview-newest-quality-i
MediaWiki:revreview-quality-i

there are references being made to
- a template, several template, or no template at all,
- a file, several files, or none,
about which we only know that their total number is not zero.

This is extremely had to translate to language where you
cannot use unspecific wordings, especially when wrapped into
a somewhat complicated sentences, as in these instances.

Since you likely do have the sum, or two individual figures,
in order to decide that the total is not zero, may I suggest
to put whatever information there is available in additional
parameters for those messages?
Using them should be marked as optional for those languages
that really to not need them, of course.
Comment 1 Aaron Schulz 2009-07-18 02:09:19 UTC
The actual number is not kept and I don't really want to change anything to do so since the sync status is already on of the more cpu expensive code areas.
Comment 2 Purodha Blissenbach 2009-07-18 10:37:27 UTC
Well, there is at least a boolean keeping track of the fact that
there are any such changes at all. How about making it an integer?
It is zero or nonzero for all uses, and it can be fed to the
message. Even if it is not precise (say, you use a LIMIT clause so
as to keep query cost low), a distinction between one, or more, would already be of great help.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links