Last modified: 2011-09-11 05:24:09 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T21281, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 19281 - Page-category mapping feature
Page-category mapping feature
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Categories (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-06-18 15:42 UTC by Le Chat
Modified: 2011-09-11 05:24 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Le Chat 2009-06-18 15:42:04 UTC
There's a perennial problem over what to do with "eponymous categories" - whether (for example) "Category:London" should be assigned as a "subcategory" of "Category:English cities", and if it is, whether "London" should then be taken out of the latter category (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Categorization/Eponymous_RFC for a discussion that shows there's currently no entirely satisfactory solution). Anyway, the problem would largely go away if the following feature could be implemented, and I wonder if it would be feasible.

The idea is that we could "map" a page to a distinguished category (for example, the syntax [[Category:Xxx| ]] with a space sortkey would cause that category to be the distinguished category for the current page, say [[Xxx]]). This would have two effects (besides placing the page in the category as now):
1) on the [[Category:Xxx]] page, an additional category box would appear containing the "Categories for Xxx", i.e. the categories to which [[Xxx]] has been assigned, even though Category:Xxx itself has not been assigned to them;
2) on any other category containing [[Xxx]], there would be a category expand button (a + sign or something) next to Xxx on the list of pages, which would expand to the category tree for Category:Xxx (thus allowing access to Category:Xxx from every category containing Xxx without the need to make it a "subcategory" of all those categories).
I know it sounds complicated, but I can assure you it would make this functionality much slicker for both editors and viewers.
Comment 1 warlord-john 2009-07-27 14:26:52 UTC
This sounds to me like a very good way to address a problem which is particularly troublesome in the English wikipedia. I would very much welcome seeing it enacted. 
Comment 2 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) 2011-09-11 05:24:09 UTC
It might be helpful to have a mock-up (aka pictures) of what your suggesting. (To be honest, this is something that's probably not going to happen in the near future unless someone submits a patch, but being able to see what the ui would look like visually might help to convince others this is a good idea).

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links