Last modified: 2011-11-29 22:08:46 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T21095, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 19095 - Enable FlaggedRevs custom configuration on ar.wikisource
Enable FlaggedRevs custom configuration on ar.wikisource
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Extension setup (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://ar.wikisource.org/wiki/%D9%88%...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-06-05 19:00 UTC by Ciphers
Modified: 2011-11-29 22:08 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Ciphers 2009-06-05 19:00:01 UTC
Similar to 14648, I would like to request enabling a custom configuration of the FlaggedRevs
extension on ar.wikisource. The local community support the extension at the local "village pump" 

http://ar.wikisource.org/wiki/%D9%88%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%8A_%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%AF%D8%B1:%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86#.D8.AA.D8.B7.D8.A8.D9.8A.D9.82_.D9.86.D8.B8.D8.A7.D9.85_.D8.A7.D9.84.D9.85.D8.B1.D8.A7.D8.AC.D8.B9.D8.A7.D8.AA_.D8.A7.D9.84.D9.85.D8.B9.D9.84.D9.85.D8.A9_FlaggedRevs

Full configuration details are as follows:

Which namespaces should allow pages to be flagged?

    * ALL NAMESPACES.

What types of tags can pages be flagged with, and what is each flag's minimal
level for a quality page?

    * THREE TYPES OF TAGS, WITH THE FOLLOWING NAMES IN HEBREW:
          o مدقق (four Arabic characters), meaning "completeness". Levels
0-4 (0="not at all").
          o مراجع (five Arabic characters), meaning "accuracy" or
"proofreading". Levels 0-4 (0="not at all").
          o منسق (four Arabic characters), meaning "formatting" or
aesthetics. Levels 0-4 (0="not at all").

How many levels are there for each tag that can be flagged?

    * LEVELS 0-4.

0= أبدا (word with four Arabic characters meaning "not at all") 1= أقل
(word with three Arabic characters meaning "minimal") 2= أكثر (word with
four Arabic characters meaning "much") 3= كامل (word with four Arabic 
characters meaning "full") 4= مختار (word with five Arabic characters
meaning "approved" or "featured")

A revision with all tags rated at least to this level is considered
"pristine"/"featured"

    * LEVEL 4.

Do flagged revs override the default view?

    * YES, BUT GIVING LOGGED-IN USERS THE ABILITY TO CHANGE THEIR PREFERENCES
TO SEEING THE CURRENT VERSION.

Who should see the current revision by default, rather than reviewed revision?

    * NO-ONE (UNLESS LOGGED-IN USERS SELECT THIS IN THEIR PREFERENCES).

Can users make comments that will show up below flagged revisions?

    * YES.

Who can set what flags to what level? (use -1 or 0 for not at all)

    * EDITORS CAN FLAG UP TO 3 and REVIEWERS/ADMINS TO 4 ("featured")

This will only distinguish "sighted", "quality", and unreviewed. A small icon
will show in the upper right hand corner.

    * NO.

Add stable/draft revision tabs. May be redundant due to the tags.

    * YES.

Review changes since stable version on save?

    * YES.

Auto-review edits directly to the stable version by reviewers?

    * YES.

Auto-review new pages with the minimal level?

    * NO.

Mark all previous edits as "patrolled" when an edit is reviewed.

    * YES.

Define when users get automatically promoted to editors. Set as false to
disable.

    * YES, USING DEFAULT VALUES.

When parsing a reviewed revision, if a template to be transcluded has a stable
version, use that version. If not present, use the one specified when the
reviewed revision was reviewed.

    * YES.

Use current unreviewed revision when situations won't allow stable revision.

    * YES.
Comment 1 Ciphers 2009-06-06 13:53:38 UTC
Further discussion have been initiated with some objetions. Please hold the bug. 
Comment 2 Dan Collins 2011-11-29 22:08:46 UTC
Invalid as withdrawn by requester, recategorizing. Reopen if this changes.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links