Last modified: 2009-06-04 00:01:28 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T21070, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 19070 - add section [edit] links to the default skin - for IP users
add section [edit] links to the default skin - for IP users
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Page editing (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-06-03 17:11 UTC by stevertigo
Modified: 2009-06-04 00:01 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description stevertigo 2009-06-03 17:11:59 UTC
Currently it is required that one be logged in to see section edit links. The reason for this AIUI appears to be a qualitative opinion with regard to IP ("anon") editors and what problems they might create if editing is made particularly visible and therefore easy to do. If this is a reason, I think it's unwiki, and any issues can be handled by the community, albeit not without some thought. 

Section editing is great, and as someone made clear a couple years ago IP edits account for a great deal of content. Some articles are getting longer too, and this means that IP editors who want to edit a section need to load up the whole page in edit mode. It could be that the large articles are well-developed and as such there is a modality of nudging contributors to log in to edit such articles, but I'm not certain there wouldn't be some quantifiable benefits to making section editing available to IP editors. 

There are of course other default interface issues to deal with, and some inclusive discussion about that might generate some ideas. Quick-selection of some basic CSS for options is one.

-Steven
Comment 1 Chad H. 2009-06-03 23:57:25 UTC
WORKSFORME?
Comment 2 Siebrand Mazeland 2009-06-04 00:01:28 UTC
WFM confirmed: http://translatewiki.net/wiki/Support?useskin=monobook (runs HEAD or very close)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links