Last modified: 2010-11-04 12:05:52 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T21053, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 19053 - Some arrows direction in SVG are wrongly rendered
Some arrows direction in SVG are wrongly rendered
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
File management (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Ariel T. Glenn
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JSP...
:
Depends on:
Blocks: svg
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-06-02 13:56 UTC by 石庭豐
Modified: 2010-11-04 12:05 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments
Image rendered by Wiki showing arrows with wrong direction (65.65 KB, image/png)
2009-06-02 13:56 UTC, 石庭豐
Details
Image rendered by Firefox 3 showing correct arrow directions (39.99 KB, image/png)
2009-06-02 13:57 UTC, 石庭豐
Details

Description 石庭豐 2009-06-02 13:56:39 UTC
Created attachment 6183 [details]
Image rendered by Wiki showing arrows with wrong direction

If you go to this URL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servlet
and click the first SVG image (Life of a JSP file), the SVG image rendered by Wiki has arrows whose directions are wrong.

To illustrate this problem, I'll attach two images:
* The first one is the screen capture of the Wiki-rendered SVG image where wrong arrows are circled in red.

* The second one shows the correct image rendered by Firefox 3.
Comment 1 石庭豐 2009-06-02 13:57:37 UTC
Created attachment 6184 [details]
Image rendered by Firefox 3 showing correct arrow directions
Comment 2 Brion Vibber 2009-08-03 16:53:53 UTC
Assigning SVG bugs to Ariel -- need a cleanup pass to see what's fixed up by a librsvg upgrade, what can be resolved with fixes to our font configuration, what can be fixed on our end, and what still needs to be pushed upstream.
Comment 3 石庭豐 2010-11-04 12:05:52 UTC
I've just checked this bug today (2010.11.04) and it is gone.  So it's somehow fixed already.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links