Last modified: 2011-07-06 21:58:08 UTC
Not sure where to file this exactly, so I'm going to call it "SecurePoll" for now. The lack of ParserFunction support at the vote server administered by SPI was a tangible nuisance. (Styling templates, particularly the translations bar, had to be converted to static formats.) Obviously it can be worked around, so not a major priority, but it would make life easier if they were installed there.
Changing component to site requests.
Robert, Tim, do we still need to arrange something like this for the upcoming board vote?
Questions about specific configuration requests should be directly to the 2009 Board Elections Committee: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Board_elections/2009/Committee/en of which I am not a member. I know ParserFunctions would have saved us some time when formatting navigation links and vote texts that needed to work across multiple languages, but one can certainly create static analogs. Hence I'd say it was a nuisance, but not really a bug.
Is this still needed?
