Last modified: 2011-07-09 02:53:38 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T20964, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 18964 - Missing old image version from 070802-F-1234S-006.jpg (reupload problem?)
Missing old image version from 070802-F-1234S-006.jpg (reupload problem?)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fil...
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-05-27 22:10 UTC by Platonides
Modified: 2011-07-09 02:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments
20090417194354!070802-F-1234S-006.jpg (462.68 KB, image/jpeg)
2009-05-27 22:10 UTC, Platonides
Details

Description Platonides 2009-05-27 22:10:16 UTC
Created attachment 6162 [details]
20090417194354!070802-F-1234S-006.jpg

File 070802-F-1234S-006.jpg in commons has a missing old version http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/b/b8/20090417194354!070802-F-1234S-006.jpg

The old image can have been (wrongly) deleted recently (the new version upload, April 2009,  is a good candidate time), in which case the bug needs to be found. Or it can be delete due to some of the old, now-fixed bugs, in which case we should consider why it wasn't detected before as a failing image (in which case it would have been restored).

Note that thumb from the old version is available: copied from the folder or recreated after the upload? Its modified time is the one of the reupload.

I attach the missing image, to be magically put in place by a server admin.
Comment 1 Ariel T. Glenn 2009-08-25 00:05:23 UTC
I retrieved the image from ms6 and put it on the production image server. This means that it must have gotten tossed some time after May 7th (when the files were copied over to ms6).
Comment 2 Sam Reed (reedy) 2011-07-09 02:53:38 UTC
Looks like this is fixed as the image exists

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links