Last modified: 2013-03-25 15:04:21 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T20887, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 18887 - Make contribs link red if no contribs exist
Make contribs link red if no contribs exist
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Special pages (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2009-05-23 22:39 UTC by Daedalus969
Modified: 2013-03-25 15:04 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Daedalus969 2009-05-23 22:39:42 UTC 
It would make seeing if an account has contribs or not at a glance easier.
Comment 1 Siebrand Mazeland 2009-05-23 23:07:53 UTC 
WFM? Special:Log/newusers does exactly that.
Comment 2 Splarka 2009-05-23 23:18:14 UTC 
See also bug 4393 

If this is being requested for newuserlog, it is a dupe of 4393

The problem is, it isn't common to see a userToolLinks() for a user that has no edits. Usually this is the case for the newuserlog, but some other possibly common ones are the move log and the upload log, assuming a wiki has not restricted these actions to require edits (via autoconfirmed age + editcount).

If it is being requested for other specific instances of userToolLinks() (see http://google.com/codesearch?num=100&q=package:svn.wikimedia.org/svnroot/mediawiki/trunk+file:phase3/+userToolLinks for examples) then possibly list which ones you want to see it on, and/or update the summary to reflect this.
Comment 3 Brion Vibber 2009-05-26 21:57:15 UTC 
This would be cheaper to do everywhere if we were joining to the user table to get current usernames or display names (which we probably ought to in the long run anyway). Then the edit count field would be available to us without additional work.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links