Last modified: 2014-10-26 20:33:35 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T20802, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 18802 - "Revision history" pages should not offer global "recent changes" feed
"Revision history" pages should not offer global "recent changes" feed
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?t...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2009-05-14 22:20 UTC by Jesse Ruderman
Modified: 2014-10-26 20:33 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Jesse Ruderman 2009-05-14 22:20:09 UTC 
If I'm on a "revision history" page such as http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toaster&action=history and click the feed button, I get a list that includes both feeds for this page and feeds for changes throughout Wikipedia.  I'm much more likely to want the feed for this page -- if I wanted the firehose, I'd go to RecentChanges first and click the feed icon there.
Comment 1 Andre Klapper 2014-10-24 21:30:14 UTC 
> that includes both feeds for this page and feeds for changes throughout Wikipedia.

Still correct:
<link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="&quot;Toaster&quot; Atom feed" href="/w/index.php?title=Toaster&amp;feed=atom&amp;action=history" />
<link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="Wikipedia Atom feed" href="/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&amp;feed=atom" />

But I don't see the problem with that?
Comment 2 Jesse Ruderman 2014-10-26 20:33:35 UTC 
The problem is that it adds a (confusing) step when trying to subscribe to a page's revision history.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links