Last modified: 2009-05-26 12:40:52 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T20772, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 18772 - RevDeleted layout misleading
RevDeleted layout misleading
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Revision deletion (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal minor (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks: revdel
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2009-05-11 19:35 UTC by FT2
Modified: 2009-05-26 12:40 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description FT2 2009-05-11 19:35:15 UTC 
If a revision did not have an edit summary, then the word "[deleted]" can be placed exactly where the edit summary would normally go. It therefore appears to be showing an edit summary was deleted, whereas in fact no edit summary ever existed.

Example: <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RevisionDelete&oldid=284084867> (visible to oversighters only)


To reproduce - create a revision with blank edit summary, then RevDelete it using "Delete revision text" as the only selected option. The result looks like this:

(diff) <s>date</s> username [deleted]
Comment 1 Platonides 2009-05-11 20:02:21 UTC 
The [deleted] text should have a CSS class distinct enough from the edit summary.
Comment 2 Happy-melon 2009-05-15 09:45:40 UTC 
Do we even need the "[deleted]"??  Isn't the fact that the timestamp no longer links to the revision, but is greyed out and struck through, informative enough?
Comment 3 Aaron Schulz 2009-05-26 12:29:31 UTC 
Message removed in r51009
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links