Last modified: 2009-03-22 15:30:28 UTC
AbuseFilter can do checks on log entries (right?), yet those are not listed on Special:AbuseFilter/examine.
Unable to reproduce, except that new account creation log entries weren't being included (move log entries were).
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Tejas81 lists an upload log entry, but it is not listed on the corresponding /examine page (linked in URL field). Or, check mine - I've made plenty of global blocks today, yet they are not listed: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/examine?wpSearchUser=Mike.lifeguard&wpSearchPeriodStart=&wpSearchPeriodEnd=&submit=1&title=Special%3AAbuseFilter%2Fexamine
(In reply to comment #2) > http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&user=Tejas81 lists an > upload log entry, but it is not listed on the corresponding /examine page > (linked in URL field). > > Or, check mine - I've made plenty of global blocks today, yet they are not > listed: > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/examine?wpSearchUser=Mike.lifeguard&wpSearchPeriodStart=&wpSearchPeriodEnd=&submit=1&title=Special%3AAbuseFilter%2Fexamine > Neither global blocks nor file uploads are supported by the Abuse Filter yet. It would make no sense to allow users to examine those log entries.
I can understand why global block logs wouldn't be included, however surely uploads are worth filtering?!
(In reply to comment #4) > I can understand why global block logs wouldn't be included, however surely > uploads are worth filtering?! Sure, but that's bug 18095 :)
(In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > I can understand why global block logs wouldn't be included, however surely > > uploads are worth filtering?! > > Sure, but that's bug 18095 :) > That is a request to access file metadata, not page text (which I thought was already done). However, the scope of the bug can certainly be changed.
