Last modified: 2014-02-12 23:38:20 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T20091, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 18091 - Sysops should be able to use Special:AbuseFilter/examine against deleted edits
Sysops should be able to use Special:AbuseFilter/examine against deleted edits
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
AbuseFilter (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest normal with 2 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-03-21 22:47 UTC by Mike.lifeguard
Modified: 2014-02-12 23:38 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Mike.lifeguard 2009-03-21 22:47:02 UTC
You should be able to test edits which are deleted if you can view the edits. Currently, deleted edits aren't returned, so you can't test filters against them. Not sure if that should be true for oversighted / sysop-can't-view revisions too... probably.
Comment 1 Andrew Garrett 2009-03-22 23:16:45 UTC
If they're not in the recentchanges table, it's going to be need a complete rewrite of the after-the-fact variable generation.
Comment 2 Andrew Garrett 2009-07-16 16:47:49 UTC
Marking this bug as Lowest priority.

I've done this in a batch to (usually enhancement request) bugs where:
* It is not clear that this bug should be fixed.
* It is not clear how to fix this bug.
* There are difficulties or complications in fixing this bug, which are not justified by the importance of the bug.
* This is an extremely minor bug that could not be fixed in a few lines of code.

If you're interested in having one of these bugs fixed, your best bet is to write the patch yourself.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links