Last modified: 2013-11-19 19:27:43 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T19842, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 17842 - Alter MediaWiki:Recordadmin-needscontent
Alter MediaWiki:Recordadmin-needscontent
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
RecordAdmin (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on: 17840
Blocks: messages
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2009-03-07 14:40 UTC by Purodha Blissenbach
Modified: 2013-11-19 19:27 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Purodha Blissenbach 2009-03-07 14:40:44 UTC 
MediaWiki:Recordadmin-needscontent
is a nonsential message of the "please click here" type that should be
reworded, and "..." replaced by true ellipses or omitted.

Thank you.
Comment 1 This, that and the other (TTO) 2013-10-29 00:48:01 UTC 
What needs to be done here? The message currently reads "Add content..." which seems fine (even if the ellipses are a bit distasteful). 

To make matters worse, this extension is still in SVN...
Comment 2 Nemo 2013-11-19 12:36:25 UTC 
Adding many blockers of bug 38638 to the list of "easy" bugs, to mark them as candidates for [[mw:Google Code-in]] tasks (gci2013). If you think this bug is not suitable, remove the keyword.
Comment 3 Nemo 2013-11-19 19:27:43 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> To make matters worse, this extension is still in SVN...

Heh, -easy then.
Closing; [[mw:Localisation#Use_meaningful_link_anchors]] is a valid concern, but it's not clear how it applies here and it's impossible to find our because there is no message documentation and the extension is abandoned.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links