Last modified: 2014-11-18 18:07:12 UTC
Autoreview right should be given to people who are reliable in writing articles; review to ones who have the ability to quickly and reliably judge the edits of others. The second does not follow from the first; when a bureaucrat needs to review a patrollers ("editor" in flagrev terminology) acitvity and decide whether to withdraw the right, he is typically not interested in the automatically flagged edits, only the ones flagged manually. The review log offers an easy way to check one's flagging activity, but there is currently no way to see only manual flaggings. (Automatic flaggings can be more or less listed by filtering on the content of the comment.) Such a filter (or, as a possible hack, an "invert" checkbox to the comment filter field) make the work of bureaucrats significantly easier.
Done in r47184 (added to qualityoversight page)
The qualityoversight page is not too useful in the situation described above; it cannot filter by users or dates. The qualityoversight page does not tell me all the flagging activity of a specific user.
(In reply to comment #2) > The qualityoversight page is not too useful in the situation described above; > it cannot filter by users or dates. The qualityoversight page does not tell me > all the flagging activity of a specific user. > Read the above message. A user field was added in r47184
Also note that the site has not been synced with the codebase yet
Ah, I missed that You removed the cutoff time when listing a specific user flaggings :) It's ok then, the important thing for me is to see _all_ the manual flags of a specific user. Thanks!
