Last modified: 2014-07-02 11:39:31 UTC
Hi, We need two Extensions to be included in ml.wikipedia.org 1. http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:PageNotice 2. http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ImageSizeInfoFunctions Thank you
Both look acceptable. ImageSizeInfoFunctions may need to move the class definition to a different file and should be added to svn, though. Could you explain the reasons you need them?
PageNotice is the important one. ImageSizeInfoFunctions can be added later. We are doing a WikiProject (http://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/വിക്കിപീഡിയ:വിക്കിപദ്ധതി/ഗുണമേന്മ) to categorize Articles & Images according to their quality and adding a mark (✔✔✔✔✔) on the top of the page. For that we need one template (http://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/ഫലകം:ഗുണമേന്മ) to be placed on all pages in article & Image namespace.
Please copy paste the above said links. or use the following: http://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject/Quality <- Poject http://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Quality <- Template
Are these extensions in use in other WMF wikis already?
Not listed here: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:Extensions_used_on_Wikimedia
I think JeLuF means that review (by Brion, presumably) is needed before doing this.
(In reply to comment #1) > ImageSizeInfoFunctions may need to move the class > definition to a different file and should be added to svn, though. > Yes. It's a subset of features offered in MediaFunctions, but it looks pretty decent. The function_exists() wrappers around wfFindFile() are useless and can be removed. Also should be updated to use ParserFirstCallInit and its associated &$parser rather than $wgParser. The $wgMessageCache injections aren't needed anymore either. PageNotice should have a way to configure it to disable per-page notices and only allow per-namespace. I know Domas didn't like per-page edit notices (see r48276).
This needs review before installation.
Sadik: See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Writing_an_extension_for_deployment for information on what is needed to get an extension reviewed before potentially deploying it on a wikisite.
Hello, this is a quasi-automated-but-not-really message: I am reviewing all tracking bugs for extensions to review and deploy to WMF servers. See the list here: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=31235&hide_resolved=1 The [[mw:Review queue]] page lists the steps necessary to complete the review. I have copied them below and done some initial filling out based on what I can easily gleen from this bug and any linked to sources that are obvious. If I miss something/state something false, please do correct me. Also, if you haven't yet done so, please review the information on and linked to from: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Writing_an_extension_for_deployment == TODO/Check list == Extension page on mediawiki.org: Yes for both Bugzilla component: Extension in Gerrit: PageNotice yes, ImageSize no Design Review: no? Archeticecture/Performance Review: no? Security Review: no? Screencast (if applicable): no Community support: appears so, but may need updating.
Does anyone still want this anymore?
Sadik: Please reply to comment 10-11.
(In reply to This, that and the other from comment #11) > Does anyone still want this anymore? Seemingly not.
