Last modified: 2014-11-20 15:17:00 UTC
Please allow the option for the "hide"/"dismiss" cookie to be notice independent (ie. if you close one notice, they don't all close).
This would take a fair bit of work, but is doable I think. I'm imagining a checkbox on the banner editing interface that says "Make hide/show toggle specific to this banner only". We would probably want to create separate cookies for the banner-specific cases and then update BannerController to look for those if the banner has the corresponding flag in the db table.
There is a discussion in bug 16821 that goes into the opposite direction - one cookie to hide all notices down, cross-wiki.
Now that we can identify banners as "fundraising banners", we could easily assign them a separate cookie. This would allow people to keep seeing normal banners, but hide all the fundraising banners. It's not a full solution to this bug, but it would take care of one of the major cases.
This is now fixed for fundraising banners - they are considered a separate group for the purposes of banner hiding.
So for the future we'd want: * default to let cooking-hiding hide all banners within the current compaign * option to let hide only hide the current banner within the compaign and also cool: * let the banner controller that chooses the banners skip ones hidden by cookie, so that others get more exposure (by removing chances of user getting a banner that is then directly hidden).
Not to muck things up even more - but what about the ability or option to use some sort of DB tag for users logged in that click to dismiss? With an increasing number of folks (I presume - could be wrong) using multiple devices and multiple WMF projects - would be handy if this was user specific rather than site/cookie/pc specific. You click dismiss on enWP and it disappears on all your WMF projects with that login - regardless of what device. Might also be handy if banners on mobile devices is ever a plan for the future.
@varnent: Your suggestion is a combination of bug 33941 and bug 14950. @all: Now that banners are separated into fundraising and non-fundraising banners, I think that takes care of most of the issue. I'm reluctant to create more atomic control over banner cookies, as such a feature would surely be used (abused) by most everyone creating banners. There may be an argument, however, for creating a 3rd banner group for "emergency banners", i.e. banners that everyone should see regardless of whether they have dismissed other banners. This would be fairly simple to implement as it would just be a 3rd cookie name. Thoughts?
With the new Z level enhancement it seems reasonable that we can implement the 'emergency' no dismiss only for banners on the 'emergency' level. We probably don't even need a cookie: we just notice that the banner is at that level and never allow it to be dismissed?
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/71751/ implements the don't hide emergency banners part.
And this is also mingle card https://mingle.corp.wikimedia.org/projects/fundraiser_2012/cards/980
Of note, casual use of "emergency" level caused bug 53116.
(In reply to Matt Walker from comment #9) > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/71751/ implements the don't hide > emergency banners part. That patch was merged a year ago. Matt Walker: This issue has been assigned to you a while ago. Are you still working (or still plan to work) on this issue? Only in case you do not plan to work on this issue anymore, should the assignee be set back to default? Thanks.
