Last modified: 2014-06-16 18:17:55 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 16575 - Global transclusion/userpage
Global transclusion/userpage
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 4547
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Interface (Other open bugs)
All All
: Normal enhancement with 5 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
Depends on: 9890
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-12-06 03:52 UTC by Joshua Ciappara
Modified: 2014-06-16 18:17 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description Joshua Ciappara 2008-12-06 03:52:37 UTC
Please see here <>. There seems to be general agreement about a function that would allow for a type of "global userpage". Further to that, some have suggested that a form of global transclusion would be useful. I understand that this is not a simple task, but its usefulness is quite clear. Hoping that you could work on it.
Comment 1 Chad H. 2008-12-13 19:48:22 UTC
Duping to the bug about enabling cross-wiki transclusion (which already exists) on WMF projects. I know there's a bug about single user pages but A) I can't find it, and B) You can only dupe to one bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 4547 ***
Comment 2 Melancholie 2008-12-14 04:57:39 UTC
> I know there's a bug about single user pages

Did you maybe mean bug 13953?
Comment 3 Nemo 2009-08-19 19:01:08 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Did you maybe mean bug 13953?

I think it's bug 14759
Comment 4 Rich Farmbrough 2009-09-04 17:24:19 UTC
This may or may not dupe 4547 depending on how they are read. 

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.