Last modified: 2009-06-19 11:05:16 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T18552, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 16552 - set $wgCategoryPrefixedDefaultSortkey=false for en.wiki
set $wgCategoryPrefixedDefaultSortkey=false for en.wiki
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement with 9 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Rob Halsell
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-12-03 19:39 UTC by Happy-melon
Modified: 2009-06-19 11:05 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Happy-melon 2008-12-03 19:39:31 UTC
Per discussion at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)&oldid=255683088#Change_default_category_sortkeys please set $wgCategoryPrefixedDefaultSortkey=false for en.wiki and do whatever magic voodoo is required to update any tables if required.
Comment 1 Alex Z. 2008-12-03 19:57:05 UTC
According to the documentation, maintenance/refreshLinks.php needs to be run after the change.
Comment 2 Barbara Pokornowski 2009-02-19 23:04:31 UTC
'''Support''': it would be really nice to be able to use the "listas" parameter in all the WPBM banners, so the tagged articles would sort correctly.
Comment 3 Brion Vibber 2009-05-28 19:03:40 UTC
Assigning this to Rob -- note that refreshLinks will take a billion years to run on enwiki these days. Tim's got some sort of parallel version rigged up, check w/ him the status on that.
Comment 4 Happy-melon 2009-05-28 21:54:43 UTC
Is this spree of "assigning X shell request to Rob" comments an indication that we should *all* be assigning not-crazily-controversial shell requests to Rob?!?  Or is it that you occasionally take a wander through the shell list, vet things, and *then* get Rob to do them?  Do you want us to make a distinction between 'big' shell requests (installing new extensions, etc) and 'little' shell requests like this?
Comment 5 Andrew Garrett 2009-06-01 13:13:22 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Is this spree of "assigning X shell request to Rob" comments an indication that
> we should *all* be assigning not-crazily-controversial shell requests to Rob?!?
>  Or is it that you occasionally take a wander through the shell list, vet
> things, and *then* get Rob to do them?  Do you want us to make a distinction
> between 'big' shell requests (installing new extensions, etc) and 'little'
> shell requests like this?

Brion would like to sight shell requests before assigning them to Rob.
Comment 6 Happy-melon 2009-06-01 13:31:40 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Brion would like to sight shell requests before assigning them to Rob.
> 

Ok, good to know.  Would it then be sensible to assign them to Brion initially, then?  If this is to be the standard process, it seems that Brion is to be the first point-of-call...
Comment 7 Mike.lifeguard 2009-06-01 17:25:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Brion would like to sight shell requests before assigning them to Rob.
> > 
> 
> Ok, good to know.  Would it then be sensible to assign them to Brion initially,
> then?  If this is to be the standard process, it seems that Brion is to be the
> first point-of-call...
> 

It'd be nice to discuss such operational stuff on wikitech-l so we're not relying on people happening upon this bug etc
Comment 8 Rob Halsell 2009-06-09 17:30:55 UTC
This bug is not the proper place to discuss that kind of policy.  However, do NOT just go assigning bugs to various folks.  When in doubt, leave it unassigned and someone will take care of it.  (Brion usually vets them, then assigns them to someone.  Do NOT just assign all bugs to him.)
Comment 9 Rob Halsell 2009-06-09 17:33:45 UTC
I have set the wgCategoryPrefixedDefaultSortkey to false for enwiki and will follow up with tim about the update links.
Comment 10 Happy-melon 2009-06-12 09:44:51 UTC
(In reply to comment #8)
> This bug is not the proper place to discuss that kind of policy.  However, do
> NOT just go assigning bugs to various folks.  When in doubt, leave it
> unassigned and someone will take care of it.  (Brion usually vets them, then
> assigns them to someone.  Do NOT just assign all bugs to him.)
> 

Okey dokey, just trying to help.  Shell requests have traditionally been an area where 'lost in the post' syndrome has been very common, and requests have sat around for months or even years with apparently nothing been done.  I see from your number-one position on this week's bug report that a concerted effort is being made to improve that situation, so thank you for that. 
Comment 11 Rob Halsell 2009-06-18 14:42:37 UTC
I am currently running a nice parallel fast version of update links.  It will still take quite awhile to finish for enwiki.  However, I am closing this ticket as all other work is complete.
Comment 12 Happy-melon 2009-06-19 11:05:16 UTC
Will that also update the category counts?  cf bug18488??

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links