Last modified: 2008-11-24 22:03:56 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 16263 - Create of new namespace called „Meinungen“ (de.wikinews.org)
Create of new namespace called „Meinungen“ (de.wikinews.org)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Rob Halsell
http://de.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews:...
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-11-06 18:31 UTC by Berliner Schildkröte
Modified: 2008-11-24 22:03 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Berliner Schildkröte 2008-11-06 18:31:41 UTC
For the realisation of a poll on de.wikinews.org [[n:de:Wikinews:Pressestammtisch#Kommentare]]: I would request a new namespace for comments called "Meinungen". A discussion namespace for „Meinungen“ is not needed as far as i know.

regards
Berliner Schildkröte
Comment 1 Raimond Spekking 2008-11-06 18:34:14 UTC
A talk namespace is necessary. Per German standard it should be "Meinungen Diskussion".

shell keyword added.
Comment 2 Berliner Schildkröte 2008-11-06 18:40:40 UTC
If it's necessary „Meinungen Diskussion“ is good.

regards
Berliner Schildkröte
Comment 3 Der Hausgeist 2008-11-06 21:33:43 UTC
I don't think that we will need a special Talk-namespace. We only need a normal namespace, we do not even need a talk namespace for the namespace. Just look at the English version of Wikinews:

http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Comments:Barack_Obama_elected_44th_President_of_the_United_States
Comment 4 Raimond Spekking 2008-11-06 21:40:10 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> I don't think that we will need a special Talk-namespace. We only need a normal
> namespace, we do not even need a talk namespace for the namespace. Just look at
> the English version of Wikinews:
> 
> http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Comments:Barack_Obama_elected_44th_President_of_the_United_States
> 

I assume some CSS vodoo :-) 

Comments talk is defined: 
    'enwikinews'    => array( 100 => 'Portal', 101 => 'Portal_talk',
                              102 => 'Comments', 103 => 'Comments_talk' ),
Comment 5 Der Hausgeist 2008-11-22 22:14:58 UTC
What is about this report? Is there any reaction in sight?..
Comment 6 Brion Vibber 2008-11-24 17:51:35 UTC
Should set the namespace key numbers to the same as enwikinews' Comments (102/103); also for best compatibility add namespace aliases for 'Comments' and 'Comments_talk'.
Comment 7 Rob Halsell 2008-11-24 22:03:56 UTC
This has been setup, there are now two new namespaces on dewikinews, 'Meinungen' and 'Meinungen_Diskussion'.  It seems most namespaces use lowercase letters for the 'discussion/talk' part of the namespace, but dewikinews already has a precedent with the Portal and Portal_Diskussion, so the two new namespaces follow the same schema.

Aliases have also been setup per Brion's directive.  If there are any other issues with this change, please feel free to reopen the ticket.

Thanks!

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links