Last modified: 2011-03-13 18:06:15 UTC
Right now, an entry in the protection log is displayed as: 12:13, October 28, 2008 BorgQueen (Talk | contribs) protected Lego [edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 16:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)) [move=autoconfirmed] (expires 16:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)) (chronic vandalism from multiple IP sources, with no useful contribution) (hist) I think the article being protection should be listed first: 12:13, October 28, 2008 Lego protected by BorgQueen (Talk | contribs) . . .
What about the other logs? They're all formatted the same way: <user> deleted <title> <user> uploaded <title> <user> moved <title> etc.
Well, good point, I hadn't noticed that, just having looked at the prot log, but yes.
Goes against the general format