Last modified: 2011-03-13 18:06:15 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 16164 - Protection log should display the protected as the first portion
Protection log should display the protected as the first portion
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Special pages (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-10-28 16:22 UTC by azog
Modified: 2011-03-13 18:06 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description azog 2008-10-28 16:22:24 UTC
Right now, an entry in the protection log is displayed as:

12:13, October 28, 2008 BorgQueen (Talk | contribs) protected Lego [edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 16:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)) [move=autoconfirmed] (expires 16:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)) ‎ (chronic vandalism from multiple IP sources, with no useful contribution) (hist)

I think the article being protection should be listed first:

12:13, October 28, 2008 Lego protected by BorgQueen (Talk | contribs) . . .
Comment 1 Alex Z. 2008-11-01 00:09:03 UTC
What about the other logs? They're all formatted the same way:
<user> deleted <title>
<user> uploaded <title>
<user> moved <title>
etc.
Comment 2 azog 2008-11-01 00:38:25 UTC
Well, good point, I hadn't noticed that, just having looked at the prot log, but yes.
Comment 3 Aaron Schulz 2009-01-02 22:18:57 UTC
Goes against the general format

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links