Last modified: 2009-09-23 18:53:00 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T18069, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 16069 - Allow bureaucrats to add or remove rights on German ArbCom wiki
Allow bureaucrats to add or remove rights on German ArbCom wiki
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://arbcom.de.wikipedia.org
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2008-10-22 20:41 UTC by Thomas Goldammer
Modified: 2009-09-23 18:53 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Thomas Goldammer 2008-10-22 20:41:44 UTC 
It's so far not possible to assign userrights other than sysop and crat (and bot) on the dewp arbcom wiki. Neither stewards nor bureaucrats can do this. Please enable all userrights to be assignable by bureaucrats on the wiki.

Thanks a lot,
Th.
Comment 1 JeLuF 2008-10-27 20:48:45 UTC 
Userrights can't be assigned directly to users. Rights are granted to groups, and users can be put into groups.
Comment 2 Thomas Goldammer 2008-10-27 22:52:10 UTC 
Ok, what was meant is, bureaucrats should be able to add and remove users to/from usergroups. Especially needed is sysop, bureaucrat, importeur (fileimport) and inactive (users in the latter group should not be able to read and write pages, right?).

Th.
Comment 3 Aaron Schulz 2009-09-01 22:09:23 UTC 
Is this still needed?
Comment 4 Thomas Goldammer 2009-09-01 23:19:08 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> Is this still needed?
> 

Maybe not, stewards can now handle it.
Comment 5 Chad H. 2009-09-23 18:53:00 UTC 
Changing to INVALID since this doesn't seem to be needed. Feel free to reopen if that changes.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links