Last modified: 2008-10-04 18:41:58 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T17426, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 15426 - Instability in formatnum output
Instability in formatnum output
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2008-09-01 18:38 UTC by Huji
Modified: 2008-10-04 18:41 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Huji 2008-09-01 18:38:02 UTC 
Please compare the output of this: http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Huji/formatnum2

which shows the numbers with exponential

with this: http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Huji/formatnum

which shows the same number, without exponential. By checking the source of the pages, you'll see that User:Huji/formatnum includes everything that is in User:Huji/formatnum2 plus a few more lines. It seems like the addition of those lines has affected the output of the line of code that is common in two files.
Comment 1 Huji 2008-09-01 18:39:37 UTC 
In case you get a different output from what I said in the above, just create a test page under your user page, with the contents of my User:Huji/formatnum2 and save it, then change the page to match with my User:Huji/formatnum and save it again and purge the cache, to see the change in the output.
Comment 2 Huji 2008-10-04 18:41:58 UTC 
As I'm unable to reproduce this bug any more, I'm marking it as WORKSFORME.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links