Last modified: 2008-10-02 01:13:34 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T17272, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 15272 - please add (locked) to list of locked accounts, like (blocked)
please add (locked) to list of locked accounts, like (blocked)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
CheckUser (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement with 8 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Aaron Schulz
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2008-08-22 19:30 UTC by spacebirdy
Modified: 2008-10-02 01:13 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description spacebirdy 2008-08-22 19:30:48 UTC 
Dear all,

this is a feature request:

From the cu-interface, if an user is blocked it is shown next to the name (blocked)

*Please add also if the username is locked via CentralAuth (locked)
*And provide a link to centralAuth

(so we don't need to copy and paste the names each time
and check the username multiple times because we do not know if it is locked or not)


Many thanks for Your help in advance.
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2008-08-22 19:32:13 UTC 
Currently locking is a concept specific to CentralAuth; we could pull that up to core User (even if it's not implemented locally) and make it available for clean lookup use by CheckUser.
Comment 2 Aaron Schulz 2008-09-30 22:55:11 UTC 
This seems too specific to be of much use
Comment 3 Mike.lifeguard 2008-09-30 23:07:08 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> This seems too specific to be of much use
> 

I don't see why - it is analogous to showing (blocked), as stated.
Comment 4 Aaron Schulz 2008-09-30 23:16:14 UTC 
Yes, but often are accounts locked as such?
Comment 5 spacebirdy 2008-10-01 02:26:06 UTC 
It is used often, because the accounts we check are often vandalism accounts, and it would save a lot of time if we knew if the accounts are locked already or not.
Comment 6 Chad H. 2008-10-01 02:31:52 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Currently locking is a concept specific to CentralAuth; we could pull that up
> to core User (even if it's not implemented locally) and make it available for
> clean lookup use by CheckUser.
> 

User, or potentially Auth? I would think the latter because an Auth system might lock an account.
Comment 7 Aaron Schulz 2008-10-02 01:13:34 UTC 
Done in r41527
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links