Last modified: 2011-03-13 18:06:49 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T17047, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 15047 - Global group membership isn't listed on Special:ListUsers/group
Global group membership isn't listed on Special:ListUsers/group
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
CentralAuth (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: crosswiki
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2008-08-05 15:11 UTC by Woojin Kim
Modified: 2011-03-13 18:06 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Woojin Kim 2008-08-05 15:11:58 UTC 
Global bot status is enabled on several wiki. Several users requested for global bot status and stewards granted global bot status to them. However Global bots aren't appeared on "Special:ListUsers/bot" in local wiki and sulutil tool. Please fix it. Best regards.
Comment 1 Roan Kattouw 2008-08-05 15:20:55 UTC 
Changed summary to be more generic: global sysops don't appear on [[Special:ListUsers/sysop]] either, etc.
Comment 2 Jesse (Pathoschild) 2008-08-05 16:15:25 UTC 
Global groups are listed separately from local groups; see [[Special:GlobalUsers/Global_bot]]. Global admins are proposed and don't currently exist. The local and global lists should probably not be combined.
Comment 3 Jon Harald Søby 2008-08-06 00:11:47 UTC 
This is a feature, not a bug. The way it is it shows the separation between global groups and local groups. It works very good if you just know how to use it.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links