Last modified: 2009-01-03 12:30:19 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T16970, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 14970 - Add a number of revisions column to the Special:ImageList page
Add a number of revisions column to the Special:ImageList page
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Special pages (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-07-29 18:15 UTC by charitwo
Modified: 2009-01-03 12:30 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description charitwo 2008-07-29 18:15:54 UTC
This would be primarily helpful to projects looking for easier way to perform housekeeping on old and outdated images, without using the maintenance script to delete everything, when there are certain or specific images that have old revisions that are kept for historical or comparison purposes.
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2008-07-29 21:38:51 UTC
Note there's not currently a revision count kept in the image table; a join/group/count() on oldimage could add this, but might not be super efficient. Since file revisions tend not to be too many it might be too awful, though.
Comment 2 Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2008-07-29 21:43:35 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Note there's not currently a revision count kept in the image table; a
> join/group/count() on oldimage could add this, but might not be super
> efficient. Since file revisions tend not to be too many it might be too awful,
> though.

Last I checked, the image page shows all revisions, no matter how many.  At worst, this would be a constant factor times as bad as viewing the actual image page, so it should be fine.
Comment 3 Aaron Schulz 2009-01-03 12:30:19 UTC
Done in r45364

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links